search

Liam Broady vs Kyle Edmund Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com

By Wojtek Kolan

At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Broady vs Edmund analysis and find out who is favored!

Our tennis head to head predictions work!
Sign up now!

Up to 78% win accuracy on past h2h matches

Want To Bet On This Match?

After checking out our Predictions and stats analysis, we recommend opening accounts at several Sportsbooks so you can get the best possible odds for the outcome. We recommend:

* To claim FREE Matchstat for 3 months – Click Here

If you’re not ready for real bets and want to practice, sign up for FREE at www.meerkatbet.com  Enjoy simulated betting with our virtual currency, learn about value bets, and compete for monthly prizes in a risk-free environment.

Liam Broady vs Kyle Edmund Important H2H Prediction Stats:

Head-to-head: Broady 1 - 0 Edmund

  • Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Broady has won 45.21% of points on their second serve, while Edmund has won 52.4%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
  • Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Broady, in recent form, has won 48.15% of their opponent's second serve points, while Edmund has won 51.85%. The same stats for first serve returns are 23.81% and 30.72% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
  • Under pressure analysis: Broady has saved 66.32% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Edmund has saved 59.38% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
  • Performance overview: Over the last year Broady has won 56.25% of matches played (W/L 27/ 21), with Edmund winning 60.47% (W/L 26/ 17) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
  • Best surface: Broady has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 63% (W/L 249/ 146), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 36% (W/L 32/ 57). Edmund has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 69% (W/L 55/ 25), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 36% (W/L 15/ 27).
  • Player level: In the last year, Broady has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 61.54% of matches (W/L 16/ 10), where as Edmund has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 77.27% of matches (W/L 17/ 5). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
  • Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Broady winning 1 times and Edmund being victorious 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Broady winning 2 and Edmund winning 0. The last match between Broady and Edmund was at the USA F30, 29-10-2012, Quarterfinals, Clay with Liam Broady getting the victory 6-3 6-1.
  • Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:0:0.
  • Deciding set H2H prediction: Broady and Edmund have played a deciding set 0 times, with Broady winning 0 times and Edmund 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
  • Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Broady winning 0, and Edmund 0.
  • Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Broady has played against opponents with an average rank of 277.94 while Edmund has played against players with an average rank of 314.63.
  • Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Broady has won 50% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Edmund has won 50% in all matches played on tour.
  • Break point conversion: In recent form, Broady has converted 34.55% of breakpoint opportunities, and Edmund has converted 39.73% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
  • If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
bet365
Liam Broady

9

Total

0

Mast

2

Chall

0

Slam

0

Main

7

Minor

156

Rank

93

High

30

Age

L

Plays

1

Total

0

0

Hard

0

1

Clay

0

0

Indoor

0

0

Grass

0

479

Rank

14

High

29

Age

R

Plays

Kyle Edmund

15

Total

0

Mast

6

Chall

0

Slam

2

Main

7

Minor

1

Total

0

0

Hard

0

1

Clay

0

0

Indoor

0

0

Grass

0

W L L L W L W L L L

Form

L L W L W L W W L L

58% (470-345)

Career Total W/L

61% (336-216)

42% (5-7)

YTD W/L

59% (19-13)

$1,004,050

Career Prize Money

$3,623,010

0

YTD Titles

2

Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.

banner

The Best Odds For Liam Broady vs Kyle Edmund For Any Market:

We highly recommend you open accounts with at least 3 Bookmakers as depending on the match, odds can vary a lot between them, and always getting the best odds available will improve your profitability a lot in the long run. We recommend these Sportsbooks for you so sign up now! Check the current best odds by clicking the Sportsbook links below:

Sportsbooks & Bookies Promo Codes For Broady VS Edmund

Get up to $1500 in bonuses if you don’t win!

Regional Signup Bonuses
With competitive adds and live betting

Broady VS Edmund H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions

stats Liam Broady Kyle Edmund
All H2H Matches 1 0
Sets Won 2 0
Games Won 12 4
Aces (Total) 0 0
DFs Total 0 0
Avg Match Time 0:0:0 0:0:0
1st Serve % 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
1st Serve Win% 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
2nd Serve Win% 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
BPs Won% (Total) 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
Return Points W% 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
Best of 3 Sets W% 100% (1/1) 0% (0/1)
Best of 5 Sets W% 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
TBs Win% (Total) 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
Deciding Set Win% 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
1st set W, W 100% (1/1) 0% (0/0)
1st set W, L 0% (1/0) 0% (0/0)
1st set L, W 0% (0/0) 0% (1/0)

Broady VS Edmund H2h Matches played

Winning Player Losing Player Score
6-3 6-1

Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents

stats Liam Broady Kyle Edmund
YTD W/L 42% (5/7) 59% (19/13)
Sets Win/Loss 46% (13/15) 58% (44/32)
Games Win/Loss 49% (121/127) 53% (386/347)
Hard Win/Loss 50% (5/5) 0% (0/0)
Clay Win/Loss 0% (0/0) 44% (4/5)
Indoor Hard W/L 0% (0/0) 68% (13/6)
Grass Win/Loss 0% (0/2) 50% (2/2)
Aces pg 0.33 0.38
Aces Total 40 136
DFs per game 0.45 0.28
DFs Total 55 102
Avg Match Time 1:39:48 1:44:4
Avg Opp Rank 184.75 347.94
1st Serve % 59% (488/829) 58% (1314/2251)
1st Serve W% 69% (335/488) 72% (951/1314)
2nd Serve W% 48% (162/341) 52% (491/937)
BPs Won% Total 40% (31/78) 40% (87/219)
Return Pts W% 38% (295/778) 39% (872/2263)
Slam W/L 0% (0/1) 0% (0/0)
Masters W/L 50% (1/1) 0% (0/0)
Cups W/L 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
Main Tour W/L 43% (3/4) 0% (0/0)
Tour Finals W/L 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
Challenger W/L 50% (1/1) 43% (9/12)
Futures W/L 0% (0/0) 91% (10/1)
Best of 3 Sets W% 45% (5/11) 59% (19/32)
Best of 5 Sets W% 0% (0/1) 0% (0/0)
TBs Win% (Total) 50% (1/2) 33% (4/12)
Deciding Set W% 0% (0/2) 50% (6/12)
1st set W, W 83% (6/5) 76% (21/16)
1st set W, L 17% (6/1) 24% (21/5)
1st set L, W 0% (6/0) 27% (11/3)

Liam Broady Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT RESULT Score H2H
R1
cross
Botic Van De Zandschulp
Player
Liam Broady
57% ( 59 of 104)
1st Serve %
55% ( 61 of 110)
9
Aces
2
11
Double Faults
9
86% ( 51 of 59)
1st Serve Won
62% ( 38 of 61)
44% ( 20 of 45)
2nd Serve Won
45% ( 22 of 49)
35% ( 7 of 20)
Break Points Won
38% ( 3 of 8)
32% ( 33 of 104)
Rtn Points Won
45% ( 50 of 110)
121
Total Points Won
93
L
6-2 4-6 6-3 6-2 H2H
R1
cross
Yoshihito Nishioka
Player
Liam Broady
56% ( 27 of 48)
1st Serve %
54% ( 54 of 100)
3
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
8
70% ( 19 of 27)
1st Serve Won
63% ( 34 of 54)
76% ( 16 of 21)
2nd Serve Won
41% ( 19 of 46)
29% ( 4 of 14)
Break Points Won
25% ( 1 of 4)
27% ( 13 of 48)
Rtn Points Won
47% ( 47 of 100)
82
Total Points Won
66
L
6-3 6-4 H2H
QF
cross
Adam Walton
Player
Liam Broady
56% ( 54 of 96)
1st Serve %
61% ( 52 of 85)
7
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
7
76% ( 41 of 54)
1st Serve Won
63% ( 33 of 52)
57% ( 24 of 42)
2nd Serve Won
58% ( 19 of 33)
67% ( 4 of 6)
Break Points Won
17% ( 1 of 6)
32% ( 31 of 96)
Rtn Points Won
39% ( 33 of 85)
98
Total Points Won
83
L
6-7(1) 6-2 6-3 H2H
Q1
cross
Liam Broady
Player
Maxwell Mckennon
60% ( 34 of 57)
1st Serve %
51% ( 23 of 45)
8
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
2
88% ( 30 of 34)
1st Serve Won
65% ( 15 of 23)
48% ( 11 of 23)
2nd Serve Won
41% ( 9 of 22)
100% ( 3 of 3)
Break Points Won
0% ( 0 of 4)
28% ( 16 of 57)
Rtn Points Won
47% ( 21 of 45)
62
Total Points Won
40
W
6-3 6-2 H2H
QF
cross
Thiago Seyboth Wild
Player
Liam Broady
55% ( 21 of 38)
1st Serve %
58% ( 23 of 40)
4
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
2
76% ( 16 of 21)
1st Serve Won
48% ( 11 of 23)
76% ( 13 of 17)
2nd Serve Won
24% ( 4 of 17)
45% ( 5 of 11)
Break Points Won
0% ( 0 of 1)
24% ( 9 of 38)
Rtn Points Won
63% ( 25 of 40)
54
Total Points Won
24
L
6-1 6-1 H2H
Q1
cross
Liam Broady
Player
Marc Polmans
43% ( 22 of 51)
1st Serve %
60% ( 36 of 60)
5
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
6
86% ( 19 of 22)
1st Serve Won
64% ( 23 of 36)
41% ( 12 of 29)
2nd Serve Won
25% ( 6 of 24)
40% ( 6 of 15)
Break Points Won
67% ( 2 of 3)
39% ( 20 of 51)
Rtn Points Won
52% ( 31 of 60)
62
Total Points Won
49
W
6-3 6-2 H2H
Q1
cross
Constant Lestienne
Player
Liam Broady
49% ( 30 of 61)
1st Serve %
52% ( 33 of 64)
7
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
7
87% ( 26 of 30)
1st Serve Won
73% ( 24 of 33)
52% ( 16 of 31)
2nd Serve Won
48% ( 15 of 31)
30% ( 3 of 10)
Break Points Won
25% ( 1 of 4)
31% ( 19 of 61)
Rtn Points Won
39% ( 25 of 64)
67
Total Points Won
58
L
6-4 6-4 H2H
R1
cross
Rinky Hijikata
Player
Liam Broady
56% ( 48 of 85)
1st Serve %
59% ( 50 of 85)
9
Aces
4
5
Double Faults
4
71% ( 34 of 48)
1st Serve Won
52% ( 26 of 50)
49% ( 18 of 37)
2nd Serve Won
57% ( 20 of 35)
24% ( 4 of 17)
Break Points Won
18% ( 2 of 11)
39% ( 33 of 85)
Rtn Points Won
46% ( 39 of 85)
91
Total Points Won
79
L
6-2 1-6 6-1 H2H
R2
cross
Andrey Rublev
Player
Liam Broady
55% ( 38 of 69)
1st Serve %
68% ( 62 of 91)
10
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
2
82% ( 31 of 38)
1st Serve Won
69% ( 43 of 62)
58% ( 18 of 31)
2nd Serve Won
34% ( 10 of 29)
30% ( 3 of 10)
Break Points Won
67% ( 2 of 3)
29% ( 20 of 69)
Rtn Points Won
42% ( 38 of 91)
87
Total Points Won
73
L
6-4 7-6(8) H2H
R1
cross
Liam Broady
Player
Pedro Cachin
63% ( 29 of 46)
1st Serve %
71% ( 30 of 42)
2
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
1
72% ( 21 of 29)
1st Serve Won
43% ( 13 of 30)
65% ( 11 of 17)
2nd Serve Won
42% ( 5 of 12)
71% ( 5 of 7)
Break Points Won
33% ( 1 of 3)
30% ( 14 of 46)
Rtn Points Won
57% ( 24 of 42)
56
Total Points Won
32
W
6-4 6-0 H2H

Kyle Edmund Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT RESULT Score H2H
Q1
cross
Felix Gill
Player
Kyle Edmund
67% ( 51 of 76)
1st Serve %
61% ( 37 of 61)
2
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
3
69% ( 35 of 51)
1st Serve Won
70% ( 26 of 37)
52% ( 13 of 25)
2nd Serve Won
54% ( 13 of 24)
60% ( 3 of 5)
Break Points Won
20% ( 1 of 5)
37% ( 28 of 76)
Rtn Points Won
36% ( 22 of 61)
70
Total Points Won
67
L
7-5 6-4 H2H
R1
cross
Joao Fonseca
Player
Kyle Edmund
60% ( 26 of 43)
1st Serve %
53% ( 28 of 53)
8
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
4
73% ( 19 of 26)
1st Serve Won
50% ( 14 of 28)
71% ( 12 of 17)
2nd Serve Won
40% ( 10 of 25)
63% ( 5 of 8)
Break Points Won
0% ( 0 of 4)
28% ( 12 of 43)
Rtn Points Won
55% ( 29 of 53)
60
Total Points Won
36
L
6-2 6-1 H2H
QF
cross
Kyle Edmund
Player
Ryan Peniston
58% ( 35 of 60)
1st Serve %
65% ( 36 of 55)
0
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
0
83% ( 29 of 35)
1st Serve Won
67% ( 24 of 36)
48% ( 12 of 25)
2nd Serve Won
21% ( 4 of 19)
57% ( 4 of 7)
Break Points Won
67% ( 2 of 3)
32% ( 19 of 60)
Rtn Points Won
49% ( 27 of 55)
68
Total Points Won
47
W
7-5 6-3 H2H
Q1
cross
Kyle Edmund
Player
Li Tu
60% ( 37 of 62)
1st Serve %
67% ( 37 of 55)
6
Aces
5
3
Double Faults
2
81% ( 30 of 37)
1st Serve Won
70% ( 26 of 37)
72% ( 18 of 25)
2nd Serve Won
61% ( 11 of 18)
100% ( 2 of 2)
Break Points Won
0% ( 0 of 2)
23% ( 14 of 62)
Rtn Points Won
33% ( 18 of 55)
66
Total Points Won
51
W
6-1 7-6(4) H2H
QF
L
6-7(4) 6-3 6-1 H2H
Q1
cross
Kyle Edmund
Player
Daniel Michalski
45% ( 35 of 77)
1st Serve %
57% ( 45 of 79)
4
Aces
4
7
Double Faults
6
63% ( 22 of 35)
1st Serve Won
60% ( 27 of 45)
50% ( 21 of 42)
2nd Serve Won
32% ( 11 of 34)
36% ( 5 of 14)
Break Points Won
50% ( 3 of 6)
44% ( 34 of 77)
Rtn Points Won
52% ( 41 of 79)
84
Total Points Won
72
W
6-4 6-4 H2H
QF
cross
Arthur Gea
Player
Kyle Edmund
59% ( 58 of 98)
1st Serve %
61% ( 52 of 85)
3
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
9
62% ( 36 of 58)
1st Serve Won
58% ( 30 of 52)
50% ( 20 of 40)
2nd Serve Won
42% ( 14 of 33)
70% ( 7 of 10)
Break Points Won
45% ( 5 of 11)
43% ( 42 of 98)
Rtn Points Won
48% ( 41 of 85)
97
Total Points Won
86
L
5-7 6-3 6-3 H2H
Q1
cross
Kyle Edmund
Player
Keenan Mayo
63% ( 38 of 60)
1st Serve %
55% ( 34 of 62)
1
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
8
66% ( 25 of 38)
1st Serve Won
68% ( 23 of 34)
59% ( 13 of 22)
2nd Serve Won
29% ( 8 of 28)
56% ( 5 of 9)
Break Points Won
60% ( 3 of 5)
37% ( 22 of 60)
Rtn Points Won
50% ( 31 of 62)
69
Total Points Won
53
W
7-5 6-3 H2H
R1
cross
Gerald Melzer
Player
Kyle Edmund
53% ( 28 of 53)
1st Serve %
61% ( 34 of 56)
1
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
4
64% ( 18 of 28)
1st Serve Won
53% ( 18 of 34)
64% ( 16 of 25)
2nd Serve Won
36% ( 8 of 22)
38% ( 5 of 13)
Break Points Won
33% ( 1 of 3)
36% ( 19 of 53)
Rtn Points Won
54% ( 30 of 56)
64
Total Points Won
45
L
6-4 6-1 H2H
QF
cross
Gerald Melzer
Player
Kyle Edmund
57% ( 54 of 95)
1st Serve %
55% ( 46 of 83)
5
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
4
59% ( 32 of 54)
1st Serve Won
54% ( 25 of 46)
54% ( 22 of 41)
2nd Serve Won
43% ( 16 of 37)
55% ( 6 of 11)
Break Points Won
19% ( 3 of 16)
43% ( 41 of 95)
Rtn Points Won
51% ( 42 of 83)
96
Total Points Won
82
L
2-6 6-0 6-3 H2H

Broady Vs Edmund Prediction H2H Images To Share

More tennis photos of Broady are available here and Edmund photos here.


Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions

Unlock All Predictions